Abstract

Digital transformation has reshaped financial management and accounting behavior among micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs), particularly within the framework of Islamic finance, where technology adoption is closely linked to ethical and sharia compliance values. This study examines the influence of digital literacy on sustainable business practices, with Islamic fintech adoption as a mediating variable among MSME actors in Gorontalo Province, Indonesia. Using a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design, this research integrates quantitative data from 49 respondents with qualitative insights obtained through in-depth interviews. The quantitative findings indicate that digital literacy significantly affects sustainable business practices (Ξ² = 0.6303, p < 0.001), while the mediating role of Islamic fintech adoption is statistically insignificant (z = 1.188, p = 0.235). The qualitative analysis reveals that social trust, religious values, and accessibility shape MSME adoption behavior toward Pegadaian Digital Syariah. Theoretically, this study strengthens the integration of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Diffusion of Innovation Theory (DOI), and Sustainable Business Model Innovation (SBM) in explaining digital transformation within Islamic finance. Practically, the results emphasize the importance of Islamic value-based digital literacy programs and inclusive digital financial accounting strategies that foster trust, ethics, and sustainability. Overall, digital literacy emerges as the key driver of MSME sustainability in the digital era, while the success of Islamic fintech adoption depends on ethical awareness and socio-cultural trust within local contexts.

Keywords

  • digital literacy
  • Islamic fintech adoption
  • digital financial accounting
  • sustainable business practices
  • MSMEs

References

  1. Abubakar A., M. . A. (2022). Factors influencing the Islamic fintech acceptance: The moderating role of Islamic financial literacy. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 13(8), 1102–1121. https://pure.kfupm.edu.sa/en/publications/factors-influencing-the-islamic-fintech-acceptance-moderating-rol
  2. Ahmad, K., & Yahaya, M. H. (2022). Islamic social financing and efficient zakat distribution: impact of fintech adoption among the asnaf in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 14(9), 2253–2284. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-04-2021-0102
  3. Alshater, M. M., Hussain, H. I., & Haider, J. (2022). Fintech in Islamic finance literature: A review. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 15(4), 665–687. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-10-2021-0394
  4. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  5. Carmagnac, L., Dubois, A., & Giard, V. (2022). Diffusion of sustainability innovation through social learning in industrial networks. Production Planning & Control, 33(11), 932–947. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2022.2128693
  6. Ciulli, F., Kolk, A., & Bidmon, C. M. (2022). Sustainable business model innovation and scaling through collaboration. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 45, 615–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.11.003
  7. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
  9. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage Publications.
  10. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  11. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06097-3
  12. Hasan, M. (2024). Fintech and sustainable development: A systematic review. International Review of Economics & Finance, 92, 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.12.012
  13. Hassan, R. (2022). Diffusion of innovation in sustainable development projects: A proposed integrative model. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 16(4), 425–440. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISD.2022.122604
  14. Jain S., P. . G. (2021). What Drives FinTech Adoption? A Study of Financial Literacy’s Moderating Role in India. Management Decision, 59(8), 1758–1778. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MD-11-2019-1553/full/html
  15. Lee, I., & Shin, Y. J. (2018). Fintech: Ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges. Business Horizons, 61(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.09.003
  16. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications.
  17. Marhadi, M., Fathoni, A. F., Setiawan, B., Pratiwi, D., Hayati, R., Boros, A., & Sudibyo, N. A. (2024). Continuance Intention of Fintech Peer-to-Peer (P2P) financing Shariah: Moderation Role of Brand Schematicity and Digital Financial Literacy. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(2), 100301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100301
  18. Martins, A., Sousa, M., & Brochado, A. (2022). Sustainability practices in SMEs: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 14(5), 2827. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052827
  19. Meyliana E.; Surjandy, S., M. . F. (2019). The Influence of Perceived Risk and Trust in Adoption of FinTech Services in Indonesia. CommIT: Communication & Information Technology Journal, 13(1), 31–37. https://journal.binus.ac.id/index.php/commit/article/view/5708
  20. Nugraha B.; Nathan, R. J.; Fekete‑Farkas, M., D. P. . S. (2022). Fintech Adoption Drivers for Innovation for SMEs in Indonesia. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(4), 208. https://www.mdpi.com/2199-8531/8/4/208
  21. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill.
  22. Oliveira-Dias, D., & Martins, F. (2022). Fostering business model innovation for sustainability: The role of dynamic capabilities in emerging markets. Management Decision, 60(13), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2022-0546
  23. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
  24. Rahayu B.; Fitria, H., R. . S. (2024). Determinant factors of Islamic financial technology acceptance: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy, 12(2), 29–45. https://jtde.telsoc.org/index.php/jtde/article/view/790
  25. Rahman M.; Sulaiman, N., A. . H. (2023). Examining factors influencing adoption of Islamic fintech. Journal of Social and Management Sciences, 14(5), 62–72. https://www.aasmr.org/jsms/Vol14/No.5/Vol.14.No.5.05.pdf
  26. Rehman, S. U., Khan, M. A., & Tariq, M. (2023). Fintech adoption in SMEs and bank credit supplies. Economies, 11(2), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11020055
  27. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed). Free Press.
  28. Sharma Y. K.; Hughes, L., P. . D. (2024). Does FinTech adoption impact on sustainability of small businesses: Mediating role of financial well-being. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 73(4). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384840994_Does_FinTech_adoption_impact_on_sustainability_of_small_businesses_mediating_role_of_financial_well-being
  29. Suhartanto, D., Arya, V., Sihombing, R., & Hadi, P. (2024). Green practices in small business: Drivers and performance in Southeast Asia. Journal of Business Research, 170, 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113384
  30. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2021). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Sage Publications.
  31. Ullah U. S.; Raza, B.; Mustafa, A., S. . K. (2022). Consumers’ Intention to Adopt m‑payment/m‑banking: The Role of Their Financial Skills and Digital Literacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.873708/full
  32. Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., & Bala, H. (2019). Bridging the qualitative–quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 43(4), 1097–1112. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/13917
  33. Waqar R.; Siddiqui, F., M. . K. (2025). Fintech revolution and sustainability: Unveiling the impact on SMEs through circular economy and green innovation practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 455, 100281. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188825002813
  34. Yeşilyurt A.; AydΔ±n, S., E. . Γ–. (2023). Digital literacy, technological literacy, and internet literacy as predictors of attitude toward applying computer‑supported education. Education and Information Technologies. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-022-11311-1